"Patriotism lies not in blind obedience to authority, but in the desire to search for the truth." - Ramman Kenoun
Re: Charlie Hebdo
Have you seen any of the many political cartoons against the Muslim religion? I would encourage you to google them if you have not already.
This French newspaper has been, for a long while, up to nonsensical and offensive political cartoons against Islam. If a religion does not believe in images of their god or prophet, then no image should be created, and never to decry that religion.
These pictures are disgusting, filthy, and I was amazed at the intonation in one cartoon that a Muslim would have sex with a pig's head! This is frightening. We know do not, verily do not, condone murder, but this enmity toward the Islam religion is out of bounds.
Of course, we are not seeing this in our U.S. newspapers, keeping us as innocent of real news as we can be.
So why is it that the Jewish people are complaining and leaving France? They should have tackled corrections in the newspaper, as prejudice now in France especially is now against the Jews, as much as it is against the Arabs.
BBC supports my exposure of Charlie Hebdo false-flag
Did somebody slip truth serum in the BBC water cooler?
For the first time in history, a leading Western mainstream news outfit is reporting accurately on evidence exposing a huge false flag operation. Read and watch this before it gets taken down!
Doubts raised over authenticity of Charlie Hebdo footage
A video clip broadcast by news agencies across the world in relation to the recent events in Paris is now under scrutiny.
For a detailed discussion of how obvious it is that the "gunman" was firing blanks, see:
I'm honored that they chose to include me in this historic event. My articles exposing and ridiculing the incredibly lame and obvious Charlie Hebdo false flag have gotten hundreds of thousands of reads, and been attacked by right-wing media and the ADL. Check them out, in chronological order:
Planted ID card exposes Paris false flag
Now BBC is stealing my stuff.
Should I sue them? Congratulate them? Or what?
And if this somehow snowballs and the Gladio B network behind this event - as well as 9/11, Bali, Madrid, 7/7, Mumbai, Boston and so much more - gets taken down, and the mainstream media start doing their job…making my alternative journalism redundant…I'm ready to accept a chair in False Flag Studies at the University of Wisconsin, home of "fearless sifting and winnowing." https://kb.wisc.edu/ls/page.php?id=21911
Editor, Veterans Today: http://www.veteranstoday.com/author/barrett/
Radio Journalist, NoLiesRadio.org:
Vindicated: Paris Events Meet the False Flag Checklist
Already numerous patterns I listed in my initial analysis, as well as others consonant with false flags, have made themselves apparent in the Paris shooting and hostage incidents. Also apparent are the predictable results that follow these events. We have seen all of the following:
1. Mass mainstream media buildup and rollout, with ready-made “placards” to call global attention to event
2. Questionable videos and details of the event, as well as drills or security buildup prior
3. Military training for the perpetrators, while the “terror” suspects with deep state connections and rap sheets run free
4. A false dialectic of left versus radicalism polarizing public consumption of propaganda
5. Investigators and key individuals in the event end up “suicided”
6. Media quickly fingers low IQ duped patsies based on magical ID appearance (think 9/11)
7. More funding for militarization, surveillance and police state with media replaying past terror events ad nauseam
Webster Tarpley explains of the purpose of synthetic terror: “Terrorism thus has been known to provide a means of social control. Parts of the US oligarchy are today almost euphoric about the seemingly endless panorama of possibilities of exploiting terrorism they believe they see before them. But it is now wide to build an entire state and social order on terrorism.” (Synthetic Terror, pg. 88)
Helpful graphic from Webster Tarpley’s Synthetic Terror.
So, have the recent terror events in Paris met these criteria? Yes, they have.
1. CNN was already on the spot, with Anderson Cooper’s 360 live on the scene, while media and French security (as per usual), had been hyping new measures in France.
2. The videos and details of the Paris shooting do not add up, as the videos contain numerous discrepancies worth considering, such as no blood or recoil, while Couliabily’s femme fatale girlfriend has been conveniently written out of the script, as Patrick Henningsen commented to me.
3. The shooters were said to be military-trained and had contacts with terror cells and Anwar al-Awlaki, a known asset of western intelligence, as well as seeking revenge for the 1995 RER convction of Rachid Ramda. The terrorists had also reportedly returned from training in Syria, where the French, UK and US governments had been arming and training the Al-Qaeda affiliated “Free Syrian Army.” Coulibaly also met with French President Nicholas Sarkozy in 2009, looking for employment.
4. Media furor is in full force, polarizing the globe into a false dialectic of either standing with Charlie, or you are a terrorist. One thinks here of. Truly fiction models reality, and reality models fiction.
Turkish President after attending funeral: The French and Mossad Are Behind The Charlie Hebdo Massacre
Turkish President's Stunning Outburst: The French Are Behind The Charlie Hebdo Massacre; Mossad Blamed
It was less than 48 hours ago when Turkey’s prime minister, Ahmet Davutoglu, joined millions marching in Paris to pay tribute to the 17 people killed by ISIS-supporting extremists. Then, almost the moment he got back, things changed, and as the FT politely paraphrases what transpired, the "country’s president struck a much more confrontational tone." That's one way of putting it. Another is that the former PM and current president, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, of NATO-member Turkey did the unthinkable: accused the west, and French citizens in particular, of staging the Charlie Hebdo murder in order to blame Muslims, even as the mayor of Ankara said "Mossad is definitely behind such incidents . . . it is boosting enmity towards Islam."
"The duplicity of the west is obvious,” Recep Tayyip Erdogan said at a press conference on Monday evening. “As Muslims we have never sided with terror or massacres: racism, hate speech, Islamophobia are behind these massacres.”
His punchline: "The culprits are clear: French citizens undertook this massacre and Muslims were blamed for it,” he added.
The FT is confused: "Although political leaders in Turkey have repeatedly condemned the attacks on the Charlie Hebdo magazine, a Jewish supermarket and a policewoman, a parallel narrative has emerged in the country, with conspiracy theorists blaming the murders on foreign intelligence agencies rather than radical Islamists."
It's not just the French who were said to be behind the attack: so is Mossad:
Melih Gokcek, mayor of Ankara for the ruling AK party, said on Monday that “Mossad [the Israeli intelligence service] is definitely behind such incidents . . . it is boosting enmity towards Islam.” Mr Gokcek linked the attacks to French moves towards recognising Palestine.
Ali Sahin, a member of Turkey’s parliament and foreign affairs spokesman for the AK party, last week set out eight reasons why he suspected the killings were staged so that “the attack will be blamed on Muslims and Islam”.
But back to Erdogan:
In his own remarks on Monday, Mr Erdogan added: “Games are being played throughout the Islamic world”. He expressed bewilderment that French intelligence services had not followed the culprits more effectively.
The FT is further confused that Turkey is not the only place which has dared to offer conspiratorial theories: Russia is too.
In Russia, some pro-Kremlin commentators sought to link the killings to geopolitical machinations by the US.
Komsomolskaya Pravda, one of Russia’s leading tabloids, ran the headline: “Did the Americans stage the terror attack in Paris?” and posted a series of interviews on its website that presented various reasons why Washington might have organised the attack.
In one interview, Alexander Zhilin, head of the pro-Kremlin Moscow Centre for the Study of Applied Problems, claimed the terror attack was US retribution against President François Hollande for a January 6 radio interview in which Mr Hollande urged the EU to lift sanctions against Russia. Washington used the attacks as “a quick fix for consolidating” US and EU geopolitical interests in Ukraine, Mr Zhilin claimed.
The FT is most stunned that in Russia the events in Charlie Hebdo are being equated to the 9/11 tragedy:
“For the last 10 years, so-called Islamist terrorism has been under the control of one of the world’s leading intelligence agencies,” Alexei Martynov, director of the International Institute for New States, a think-tank, told pro-Kremlin internet outlet LifeNews. “I am sure that some American supervisors are responsible for the terror attacks in Paris, or in any case the Islamists who carried them out.”
Whatever could have given the Russian this idea...
Good job, France. You've fallen hook, line and sinker for the lowest, basest manipulation possible
Paris Killings: Media Lies, Unanswered Questions. Was it a False Flag?
Posted: 11 Jan 2015 10:28 AM PST
How many media outlets bothered to tell us that the injured French policeman executed by terrorists on the pavement was a Muslim French policeman by the name of Ahmed Merabet. These terrorists seemed like professionally trained maybe by a state intelligence service and... !
Subject : Unlike Muslims Zionist supremacists enjoy immunity from mockery
January 12, 2015
In Europe Zionist supremacists enjoy immunity from the mockery to which Muslim subordinates are subjected
By Michael Hoffman
Stephen Whittle and Simon Sheppard in jail in Britain for distributing Tales of the Holohoax cartoons
The spectacle in Paris on Sunday, which saw censors and inquisitors like Angela Merkel of Germany who approved a five year prison sentence for German writer Ernst Zündel, marching with Benjamin Netanyahu who slaughtered more than 2100 Palestinians a few months ago, must have afforded the ghosts of the murdered Charlie Hebdo newspaper cartoonists one last spasm of jeering laughter.
The January 7 killing of the anti-Muslim, anti-Catholic and marginally anti-rabbinic newspaper’s top artists, who were shot because they freely expressed themselves, has been transformed into an international commercial for “persecuted Jews” who got tossed into the grief for Charlie by a strategically timed attack on a kosher grocery store in Paris.
The US supports the Wahhabist/Salafist Islam that produced last week’s shooters, although Obama has not been as rabid a supporter as McCain, Romney and Republicans in general. (If Mr. Romney has won the presidency the US would have likely bombed Iran by now and Syria’s Assad would have gone the way of Qaddafy, in what is now the al-Qaeda stronghold of Libya).
The cozy alliance of Congress and Saudi Arabia — which is in no danger of US bombing or invasion — is evidence of the treason at the pinnacle of the US government. Congress and the US media "forget" that Saudi Arabia continues its compact with the Wahhabist clerics who inspired al-Qaeda and continue to inspire ISIS. If ideas matter, and Right wing Republicans continually tells us they do, then we should be deeply concerned that the US supports a theocracy whose state-sponsored imams disseminate the thinking behind the army of Boko Haram (which last week razed the the entire town of Baga, killing at least 2,000 Nigerians), the head-choppers of ISIS, and the supposed 9/11 airline hijackers of al-Qaeda.
Misconceptions about Freedom of Speech in Judaism and Islam
A popular myth has it that Islam cannot abide freedom of speech while Judaism is a bastion of the values which have fostered that speech. After serving nearly a year in prison for giving a revisionist history speech in Austria, English author David Irving was on the verge of being released from confinement when Zionist barbarians across Britain and Europe mercilessly howled for his continuing imprisonment. Any free speech values that Judaism supposedly harbors are largely for public relations value and are derived from the Christian West, and from the Judaics who were inspired by the Enlightenment to form the Haskalah movement, which eventually repudiated the Babylonian Talmud, and whose members were known as maskilim.
One such maskil was Joseph Perl (1773-1839), author of a book that revealed secrets of Judaism, Megallé Temirin. All available copies of this volume were bought up and destroyed by Orthodox rabbis and their followers. This was similar to the treatment the Catholic Holy Roman Emperor — at the request of his army's financier, Samuel Oppenheimer, and his court’s Hoffactor, Rabbi Samson Wertheimer — accorded to Lutheran polymath Johann Andreas Eisenmenger’s masterpiece, Entdecktes Judenthum in 1700; and which Orthodox Judaics inflicted on Israel Loebl’s anti-Talmudic book Sefer ha-Vikkuah in 1797. These are not isolated cases. Talmudic Judaism is inherently totalitarian.
Judaism, like Freemasonry (another phony “bastion of liberty”), is concerned with freedom only for its members, the Holy People, who are set above humanity. This is why most of the victims of the modern British and European inquisition against revisionist writers and activists are almost completely disregarded by the media, and someone like Merkel who can jail German writer Ernst Zündel for five years, is allowed to commemorate Charlie Hebdo in Paris without even one journalist from a major news outlet challenging her disgraceful charade.
Britain, France, Germany and other “democratic” European countries jail intellectuals like Zündel, Robert Faurisson, Germar Rudolf and David Irving with total impunity. These men are not insiders; they’re not members of the Brotherhood or the Holy People’s tribe. In spite of all of the palaver about racism and bigotry, the ultimate in that field is the reduction of those who are not spokes in the Talmudic-Masonic wheel, to the status of sub-humans and non-persons. The two-faced Talmudic-Masonic standard that was present at the founding of modern France in 1789 has stood the test of time.
In Britain, Simon Sheppard and Stephen Whittle were imprisoned for distributing this writer’s own exercize in Charlie Hebdo-style “blasphemy,” the Tales of the Holohoax cartoons. Again, because Sheppard and Whittle are not plugged into the networks of Judaism, Zionism and Freemasonry, whatever happens to them, however much it may radically undercut the rhetorical sleight of hand which the Cryptocracy is now employing, the newsworthy fact that two English guys went to jail over cartoons lampooning Holocaustianity, is deemed unworthy of news coverage in the midst of the public agony over the fate of Charlie’s cartoonists.
Terrorists like Netanyahu and dungeon-operators like Merkel can march on the boulevards of Paris in the name of liberty and human rights and instead of being jeered off the streets and shamed for their disgraceful farce, they comprise the face of “the fight for freedom of speech and against terrorism.”
This hallucination is part of the civic magic which has emerged in our hypnotic age. The terrorist factions of Islam will not be halted by this moronic spectacle, or by the Right wing parties in Europe whose adherents are aborting and contracepting themselves out of existence, while Muslim parents give birth to as many children as Europeans did when their nations were still Christian.
The British and Europeans have cut a deal with the rabbis and Zionists to repress writers and activists who blaspheme Holocaustianity and the religion of the Talmud. Muslims understand this. The whites of Europe mostly do not.
Muslims will never consent to the bargain to which modern Europeans and the British have submitted — a Zionist fatwa against “extremist” writers who oppose Judaic religion and history — a pious dictate which has become the law of the land in a UK and Europe which demands that Muslims “learn to tolerate” the type of withering satire and mockery which landed Sheppard and Whittle in Her Majesty’s clink.
The current situation in which Zionist supremacists enjoy immunity from the tough satire to which Muslim subordinates are subjected, is a self-defeating recipe for disaster. This fact lights the way to the probability of a conspiracy at work, with the goal being a police state across the western world to “defend” against that which the Establishment itself has conspired to create. The “war with radical Islam” is being mounted by a Europe which supported al-Qaeda against Qaddafy and the Islamic State against Assad, and now finds itself under siege by al-Qaeda and the Islamic State. Surprise, surprise.
Anyone who truly cares about peaceful coexistence in Britain and Europe will dump the double standard and choose to either grant Muslims the same legal protection from doubters, deniers and mockers which Judaism and the sacred gas chamber relics enjoy, or better yet, affirm freedom for all and open the printing presses, televisions and microphones to untrammeled access by the Faurissons, Zundels and Irvings, and to the cartoonists who antagonize Judaics as much as Charlie Hebdo did the Muslims.
However, we could't resist conveying the following joyous news as soon as possible!
On social media, our Twitter feeds have reached tens of thousands and perhaps hundreds of thousands of people around the world by being repeatedly "retweeted" and "favorited" in record numbers by people in Asia, the Middle East, Britain and Europe. Our "On the Contrary" blog has also received thousands of hits.
Our blog and our tweets have all been relentlessly focused on reporting the huge disparity of arresting those who blaspheme the West's most sacred relic, the alleged execution gas chambers of Auschwitz, while celebrating and lionizing those who blaspheme Islam's Prophet.
Today we have evidence from the Jan. 13 online edition of The Times of London, Britain's equivalent of the New York Times, that our relentless campaign is beginning to make a significant impression in France! Here is a screen grab from an article in The Times online, reporting from in front of the Great Mosque in Paris:
Never surrender! Keep punching!
From masonic Britain where justice is always “On the Level”: we have obtained a copy of the Royal Court of London’s lengthy legal judgment against the two English men who were convicted for distributing our Tales of the Holohoax cartoons, for which they were sentenced to nearly two years imprisonment and four years imprisonment respectively. The western media omit the reporting of these facts as the world continues to consider the ramifications of the terror attack on the Charlie Hebdo cartoonists, which occurred one week ago, on the 30th anniversary of the start of the “Crown Prosecutor’s” show trial in Toronto of German-Candian publisher Ernst Zündel. The British Crown’s full criminal judgment against Stephen Whittle and Simon Sheppard is online here: http://revisionistreview.blogspot.com/2015/01/legal-judgment-against-distributors-of.html It makes for chilling reading. I hope you will assist in widely publicizing this revealing document. It represents irrefutable evidence of the British government's inquisition and censorship of satire which, if they had any sense of shame, ought to serve to embarrass their legal system down to its roots. Given that its roots are in the Star Chamber and Prince Michael of Kent's Lodge however, we should not be disappointed if no such remorse or decency is forthcoming from that quarter.
Rumors are floating across the Internet that Mossad, or US intelligenceor both agencies were behind the Charlie Hebdo and kosher grocery store terror in France. A link to those allegations is here: http://cnsnews.com/news/article/patrick-goodenough/russian-media-turkish-politicians-suggest-us-israeli-involvement Al-Qaeda in Yemen on the other hand supposedly claims responsibility for the Paris terror. See here: http://nyti.ms/1yf95r9
French scholar Robert Faurisson, the courageous octogenarian dean of European revisionists who guided Mr. Zündel’s legal defense team andwho has been repeatedly beaten, prosecuted, jailed and heavily fined in France for publishing doubts about the authenticity of the sacred relics of Holocaustianity, offers his insights into the situation in the aftermath of the attacks in Paris: http://revisionistreview.blogspot.com/2015/01/persecuted-french-revisionist-charlie.html
The Good News is that commensurate with our reporting on Charlie Hebdo and the repression against French and British revisionists and cartoons that satirize Israeli bigotry and the “Holocaust’ cult, our Twitter feed and our On the Contrary blog have gained the highest number of readers in their history. It appears that most of this welcome growth in our worldwide audience is among readers in Europe and Britain.
The other news is that our intense activity in this regard has put our other writing and research work on the back burner; consequently we are behind on many pressing commitments including our hard copy Revisionist History newsletter for January and our forthcoming book, “The Occult Renaissance Church of Rome.” We ask for your forbearance in these matters. The planetary publicity for the attack on Charlie Hebdo has opened an enormous opportunity for revisionists to attempt to focus attention on the other forms of “blasphemy of religion" which the controlled media are desperate to conceal as they hypocritically bait Muslims about Islam's lack of tolerance. Rabbinic and Zionist lack of tolerance must be made an issue. We have been hammering away at this with all the resources at our command. One must strike while the iron is hot.
Copyright © 2015. All Rights Reserved
Today’s Hoffman Wire column is online here
SATURDAY / JANUARY 10, 2015
NY Times: French Premier Declares ‘War’ on Radical Islam as Paris Girds for Rally
By DAN BILEFSKY and MAÏA de la BAUME
Law enforcement officials appealed to the public to help find Hayat Boumeddiene, the girlfriend of Amedy Coulibaly, who took hostages at a kosher supermarket.
Now in its 4th consecutive day of front page, anti-Muslim hysteria over the false-flag 'Charlie Hebdo' newspaper shooting, Sulzberger's kosher Slimes quotes French Prime Minister Manuel Valls:
"It is a war against terrorism, against jihadism, against radical Islam, against everything that is aimed at breaking fraternity, freedom, solidarity."
The French government will deploy 500 additional troops on the streets amid preparations for a giant unity rally in Paris today. German Chancellor Angela Merkel and Prime Minister David Cameron of Britain are scheduled to be there. Other foreign officials who have said they would be at the rally include the Globalist puppet-traitor, President Mahmoud Abbas of the Palestine Authority and, of course, the man of the hour, the one who orchestrated the bloody farce (or was it another Sandy Hook), Prime Minister Benjamin Satanyahu of Israel. Nice theatric touch having the "suspects" take "hostages" in a kosher market, Bibi. That ought to silence that anti-Israel chorus that had been gaining such momentum in France.
And here's the kicker. The article reveals that there is now "99% certain" that Hayat Boumeddiene, the fugitive female of this alleged terror gang, has escaped to, Syria. How convenient. "Hand her over, Assad, or else!", is that it? After doing a stint in Syria, perhaps the script writers can have her pop up again in Iran, or North Korea? Like that Jewish Hollywood song used to say: "There's no business like show business."
Suckers and chumps, played for fools again and again.
Date : 12/01/2015 - 17:24 (GMTST)
Subject : [APFT] Video Evidence on Paris Staged False Flag Operation to generate anti-Islam propaganda: Google has been removing the videos that show this fake shot.
False Flag Is So Common … There’s a Name for It. It was given 100 years ago. Painting by Anthony Freda (see examples of other false flags at the end)
Just as in all false flag operations such as 9/11, 7/7, etc., the Paris staged false flag is psy-op to create fear and generate anti-Islam propaganda to deflect attention from the Western Elites’ financial and political power games and turn public opinion in favour of te Zionist state.
1. Charlie Hebdo has reportedly made fun of the Mossad agent Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi whose real name is Simon Elliot and who poses as the leader of ISIS. However, cartoonists who were exposing Zionist crimes were fired from their jobs and Charlie Hebdo was about to go bankrupt.
2. French MPs voted in favour of a Palestinian state days before the attacks. Netanyahu said, back in November that France was going to commit a Grave Mistake if they were to recognize a Palestinian State.
3. France voted against Israel at the UN.
4. Unequivocal Warning To France http://stateofthenation2012.com/?p=9864 because France declared an end to the Russian sanctions just two days before the terror attacks. France was leading the chorus of European voices wanting to back out of the US war agenda? Israelies have taken control of the Ukraine government and are after Russian wealth now. (remember shortly after 9/11 when Mexico didn’t want to join in the war on terror, Mossad sent its goons to blow up the Mexican Parliament using fake passports. They were caught and after intervention by their Israeli ambassador, they were sent back to Israel).
5. Manufacture a defeatist opinion towards Islam or a public longing for the NWO promises of peace after the next WW3.
6. Steam-up strong public emotions towards whatever direction the Zionists want.
However, some good people are exposing both the Paris false flag operation and its ensuing propaganda.
"I was born Christian. If that makes Rupert Murdoch my responsibility, I'll auto-excommunicate. The Spanish Inquisition was my fault, as is all Christian fundamentalist violence. Oh, and Jim Bakker." — J.K. Rowling, in response to this tweet:
Jewish lady Dhalia Wasfi exposes US/Israel war crimes: http://youtu.be/duLPbu8ZYmk
Smoking Gun Video Proves Paris Attack was Fake and done in two takes! Case Closed!
Amchai Stein, the deputy editor of Israeli IBA Channel 1, just happened to be at the scene and has been posting photos of the shooting. We can see below that they are staged. http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=paris+attack+video+hoax
Watch the video that Google has been removing because it has evidence that the attack was a false flag staged operation:
The above evidence sheds doubt on the official story regarding the Charlie Hebdo shootings.
Friday, 9 January 2015
Indications that the Paris Attack was an inside job, involving Mossad and the French security services. QUESTIONS:
· Why did the attack happen now? weren't the first cartoons published in 2006 and the second batch 7 months ago?
· Police chief in Limoges, France, just committed suicide, and 'he was working with the judiciary police on the case of Charlie Hebdo'? here's the link to the French article
· First news website to disclose the identities of the "suspects" was a Zionist website in French language, see link below before it gets removed
The website obtained all three identities from a Facebook post made by Pierre Martinet a former DGSE agent (post on Facebook has been removed but link is the url above). Zionist news website also posted the ids before everyone else, from a "high level" source they won’t disclose. this was before the scoop made it to the news channel.
· the getaway car of the terrorists at Charlie Hebdo, was abandoned in front of a.... kosher pastry shop.. you can’t make this up. see link with pictures at the Zionist website here:
· The guy on the roof wearing the flack jacket in the street video appeared on CNN and lied through his teeth. That whole roof top crew were agents.
The journalists from Charlie Hebdo only gather in their Paris office once per week. "A Charlie Hebdo reporter told the French newspaper Le Monde that the attackers had to have been informed that the editorial meeting was taking place, otherwise there are not many people on the premises."
Who would have informed the shooters about the meeting on that day? A little help from the NSA or what?
2. There was police INSIDE the Charlie Hebdo offices BEFORE the attack took place. "Two officers who had been assigned to protect editor and cartoonist Stephane Charbonnier for the past several years came down from an upper floor and intercepted the gunmen." Confusion as French hunt magazine attack suspects
How is it that the police seemed so useless? A journalist at Charlie Hebdo let the gunmen into the heavily protected offices.Strangely, there were no armed police outside the offices.
3. There were heavily armed police in the vicinity and all over the center of Paris.
"Outside the building, as the gunmen tried to flee in their Citroën van, three officers in a police patrol car intercepted them. "Two suspects got out of the van..."An officer ...ran toward the suspects. But the officer was shot and wounded by the suspects. He was executed with a shot to the head as he lay on the sidewalk." Confusion as French hunt magazine attack suspects
After this policeman was allegedly 'shot' in the head with blanks, there is no sign of blood or blown off head!
There are 3 different accounts of who this policeman was. In one account he is an officer who emerged from a police car. In another account he is a policeman who came out of a police station. And in a third account he is a policeman who was on a bicycle.
CanSpeccy alerted us to this video. Google keeps on censoring this affair, so here it is on LiveLeak.com - Charlie Hebdo police officer shooting zoomed in ...
Google has been removing the videos that show this fake shot.
4. After allegedly “killing” the officer, the gunmen returned to their car, shouting, 'We avenged the Prophet Muhammad,' the source said." Confusion as French hunt magazine attack suspects
The purpose of this source would appear to be to label the gunmen as Moslems, rather than assets of Mossad and the French government.
5. Mossad and the French security services appear to have had their posters printed in advance?
Sasha Reingewirtz, 28, president of the Jewish Students Union, said of the killers: "They want to scare French citizens."
Confusion as French Hunt Magazine Attack Suspects
Amchai Stein, the deputy editor of Israeli IBA Channel 1, just happened to be at the scene and has been posting photos of the shooting.
6. In false flag attacks, the alleged terrorists allegedly leave behind identity cards or passports.
7. In false flag attacks, the authorities often give conflicting evidence.
"Two senior U.S. counter-terrorism officials told NBC News that one of the suspects in the attack had been killed and that two others were in custody."
Confusion as French hunt magazine attack suspects
The 'patsies' were probably in custody before the attack.
8. In false flag attacks, the security services need 'patsies'.
The French authorities have named the 'patsies' as Said Kouachi, Cherif Kouachi and Hamyd Mourad.
Several of Hamyd's school friends have taken to Twitter saying he was in class with them at the time of the attack.
The Kouachi brothers have secular (non religious) backgrounds, just like the 9/11 patsies.
Said Kouachi, 34, and his brother Cherif, 32, were orphans who were brought up in a care home in Rennes in northern France.
The CIA and its friends like to mind-control orphans from children's homes to turn them into useful patsies.
The brothers had menial jobs such as pizza delivery man, and shop assistant.
Charlie Hebdo has reportedly made fun of the Mossad agent Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi (Simon Elliot) who is the leader of ISIS.
10. CanSpeccy alerted us to this video which apparently shows the fake shooting of the policeman.
Does the shooting of the policeman look totally fake?
Twelve people, 10 journalists and two policemen, were reportedly killed.
Amchai Stein, the deputy editor of Israeli IBA Channel 1, just happened to be at the scene and has been posting photos of the shooting.
"Two black-hooded men entered the building with Kalashnikovs. A few minutes later we heard lots of shots," a witness told local TV station iTele, adding that the men were then seen fleeing the building.
The attackers spoke perfect French and reportedly said that they support the CIA militia called al Qaeda.
Charlie Hebdo's editor-in-chief Gerard Biard escaped the attack because he was in London.
11. They were able to pull off their attack without any problems from the police. NONE were shot or wounded by the police, who are crawling all over Paris, except on that day. An AK 47 and it makes one helluva recoil, unlike that phony recoil you see--or don't see--in the above video.
‘Benoit Bringer, a journalist with Agence Premiere Ligne who saw the attack, told the iTele network he saw several masked men armed with machine guns. He said two officers arrived on bicycles, then — apparently unarmed — they left.'”
12. As terrorists and extremist nutjobs, why didn't they destroy the offices of c.h; and everything related to the cartoons that supposedly pushed them to commit such a heinous act? (isn't that what isis and the likes do?) They shouted 'we have avenged the prophet mohammad!', not followed by 'peace be upon him', which is a phrase almost everyone of the 1.6 billion muslims in the world says following the prophet's name (pbuh), let alone radical religious extremists.
13. in one of the photos the police officers are laughing and joking next to the shot up car where someone supposedly died. Additionally, images on Google of shot up windshields have cracks going all through the windshield. In this France event, all damage is limited to where the holes are. Is that possible?
14. All people who responded to the scene had French Foreign Legion haircuts. Odd for ambulance drivers and EMT's.
15. How did the road miraculously have no traffic? The scene is set up as if staged. It is as if the area was cordoned off prior to the "attack" for a drill, so the "terrorists" simply parked smack dab in the middle of the road because they knew there would be no traffic.
16. All video initially posted was shot from rooftops. FOR A SCENE THAT LASTED LESS THAN A MINUTE. How did anyone get up to the roof that fast to get video of this, times several people shooting from different places? The roof tops were just regular roof tops with no reason for anyone to be up there. It is not like there was a roof top Starbucks or something. Why were people up there to begin with, how did they figure out what was going on and have their cell phones all ready to shoot video from perfect angles from start to finish?
ANSWER: They went up ahead of time, got in position, and shot video of a drill they knew would happen. It is the only rational answer. Even if they were a roofing crew, they would not have figured out something was going on and had camera phones (times several) shooting clear video in under 15 seconds to capture this less than a minute long event. The staged camera angles and time frame alone nails this as a fraud, such timing and positioning is flatly impossible. Even the robot android DATA from Star Trek could not have gotten up to the roof that fast, found where to shoot the best video from and captured this so well.
17.: Getaway driver was in school at the time of the "incident"
Classmates stand up for him.
The classmates of an 18-year-old suspect in the Paris shooting, that occurred yesterday afternoon at the offices of Charlie Hebdo magazine, have protested his innocence by saying that he was in class at the time of the incident in which 12 people were murdered.
Hamyd Mourad was reported to have handed himself to the police at around 11pm last night after he saw his name mentioned on the news and his friends and acquaintances have said that he has an alibi, as they claim he was present in the classrooms that day.
It won't matter, just like the Boston bombing, where dorm room mates said Tsnarev was not at the bombing scene when it happened. Once they name a patsy, he is TOAST. What an innocent dupe Hamyd was for turning himself in expecting the system to be just when running a Jewish scam! Gitmo time!
The footage of the Charlie Hebdo shootings has been restricted or taken down from a number of websites. As you will see it contains no blood, gore or graphic violence. It does however punch a major hole in the official story. You can draw your own conclusions.
The clip was played on France 24. You'll notice in the middle that a section is edited out.
Let's look at the clip that was edited out for obvious reasons as it exposes the false flag operation clearly.
Now if we zoom in and slow it down you'll see that the officer isn't actually hit by a bullet. There is a blast that hits the sidewalk just in front of him, but he is clearly not hit in the head as the corporate media is claiming.
Let's watch it again. Notice that the head isn't rocked by the blast as it would be if he was actually hit. Notice the plume of dust about a foot in front of him as the shot hits the ground. This is a AK-47. A hit to the head would splatter blood and brains all over the sidewalk.
Anyone who claims that this footage shows someone being hit in the head by a 7.62×39mm round either has no experience with guns, or is lying. This is a big bullet that does massive damage and makes a bloody mess. This officer was NOT killed by a gunshot to the head.
My first thought here was "ok, they missed". Just one problem. Every single mainstream media outlet is claiming that he was finished off with a shot to the head, and that's blatantly false.
So then you have to ask, what else are they lying about?
Funny thing is, these guys went to the trouble to put on ski masks, but for some reason, according to the authorities, they decided to leave their identity cards laying in the get away car. That's how the perpetrators were identified. Really? Come on.
The other funny thing, the suspects wound up dead, so case closed.
Now I'm not going to claim to know what really happened here, but we are being lied to, and lies like this mean trouble is coming.
Plus we even have a fake news reporter slipping up and saying “The blood on the ground which has been put there!”
Fake News Reporter saying “The blood on the ground which has been put there”
The above video shows that the security services did the false flag attack in Paris.
This video CLEARLY shows that the cop on the ground was not hit by anything! They were shooting blanks just as Gordon stated by the distinct sound of a REAL AK-47 shooting REAL rounds.
I urge everybody to go to the original footage of the attack on LiveLeak and you can easily see this for yourself! Spread the truth everywhere. We have the smoking gun video that proves they did this in at least two takes!
The mysterious death of Chief Inspector Eldric Fredou is not reported on all major French medias. This is what I dare post from France about an obvious false flag which might fuse-up WW3.
The act of terrorism which began three days ago with the murder of the near totality of the editing staff of Charlie-Hebdo has finished two days later with a firework of news media showing a double assault by police forces at two separate locations. The entire drama is shown endlessly on all medias. To morrow Sunday, rallies under the banner “Je suis Charlie” are expected to draw crowds of hundreds of thousands all around the nation.
Those are the signs of a false-flag: The killings inside the Magazine building did occur, as well as the killings at the end. What was fabricated was the “gunfight” outside in the street, before the terrorists “escaped”. The US alternative medias were quick to tell that the “gunfight” was staged, with disaster actors (no blood of the downed policeman who was “shot in the head”, without a drop of blood, or again the obvious use of blank shots). This staged scene of a “gunfight” was inserted with the real scenes, in order to DRAMATIZE the event. This addition of a dramatization, is a PROOF that the attack was done by more than the terrorists who are now dead.The French news media have shown the staged “gunfight”, while blurring the images when the policeman was being “shot in the head”, justifying this blurring of the image for protecting the public from seeing too much horror.The French will therefore never know what the American know.
Also the “dead policeman” who “got shot in the head” remains unknown. His photo i.d. is not shown, while the photo i.d. of all the other victims are shown.The justification for this omission by the French media is not told, and no one of the controlled media has raise this issue. Cover-up of a false-flag? Yes! The French public had been conditioned a day before the attack, by the highly publicize launching of the latest book from the most read author named Michel Houelbeck. The book, titled “Soumission”, is precisely about the French problem with Islam, and its submission to Islam, being the inevitable outcome. This subject raised could have been a conditioning to the reading public, since the attack by Islamist was to occur on the next day, against a weekly newspaper. This detail is not known in the US, and is in France presented, if ever talked about, as a “coincidence”. False-flag sign?Yes!
The French government acted within the hour of the attack, in a coordinated effort of appeasement, while promising to be strong against the “terrorists”, and not against Islamist, while the medias began inviting Muslims to explain that Islam is a “religion of peace”. I hear those lines already by mid-September 2001. Could the Charlie-Hebdo be a French 911? It looks like it! The MYSTERIOUS DEATH OF THE POLICE CHIEF INVESTIGATING CHARLIE-HEBDO REMINDS ALSO OF THE MYSTERIOUS DEATH OF INVESTIGATORS OF 911. If it looks like; if it follows the identical gov/media pattern as a false-flags; if collateral damages such as death of investigators of a false flag, then it is a false flag.
Finally the French government admits errors from having ignored warnings from the US government. It is therefore expected that both the French and the US, will work more closely in the future. Aren’t those two nations already colonies to Zion?
What is the purpose to fool the public? The first is to create fear. The second is either to manufacture a defeatist opinion towards Islam or a public longing for the NWO promises of peace. The third is to steam-up strong public emotions towards whatever direction the Zionists want. The last reason presented by the alternative medias is to mask the latest sex scandal of Bill Clinton and Crown Prince Andrew, but this last reason is small theater. The important reason is truly the next to come WW3.
“False flag terrorism” is defined as a government attacking its own people, then blaming others in order to justify going to war against the people it blames. Or as Wikipedia defines it:
False flag operations are covert operations conducted by governments, corporations, or other organizations, which are designed to appear as if they are being carried out by other entities. The name is derived from the military concept of flying false colors; that is, flying the flag of a country other than one’s own. False flag operations are not limited to war and counter-insurgency operations, and have been used in peace-time; for example, during Italy’s strategy of tension.
The term comes from the old days of wooden ships, when one ship would hang the flag of its enemy before attacking another ship. Because the enemy’s flag, instead of the flag of the real country of the attacking ship, was hung, it was called a “false flag” attack.
Leaders Throughout History Have Acknowledged False Flags
Leaders throughout history have acknowledged the danger of false flags:
“This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when he first appears he is a protector.”
“If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy.”
– U.S. President James Madison
“A history of false flag attacks used to manipulate the minds of the people! “In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations, and epochs it is the rule.”
― Friedrich Nietzsche
“Terrorism is the best political weapon for nothing drives people harder than a fear of sudden death”.
– Adolph Hitler
“Why of course the people don’t want war … But after all it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship … Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.”
– Hermann Goering, Nazi leader.
“The easiest way to gain control of a population is to carry out acts of terror. [The public] will clamor for such laws if their personal security is threatened”.
– Josef Stalin
People Are Waking Up to False Flags
People are slowly waking up to this whole con job by governments who want to justify war.
More people are talking about the phrase “false flag” than ever before.
*** exposing the hidden truth for further educational research only *** CAVEAT LECTOR *** In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have